| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 32 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 31 Guest(s) Bing
|
| Latest Threads |
X10+v1 and v2 and failsaf...
Forum: Setup and usage
Last Post: flyingw
02-24-2026, 04:25 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 53
|
X10+v2 and ELRS
Forum: Setup and usage
Last Post: flyingw
02-21-2026, 03:33 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 71
|
The Future
Forum: XtremeLink Radio System
Last Post: flyingw
01-31-2026, 09:54 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 1,464
|
Merry Christmas
Forum: XtremeLink Radio System
Last Post: XPS
12-21-2025, 03:30 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 1,001
|
SBUS-2 and the X10+v2
Forum: Setup and usage
Last Post: flyingw
12-11-2025, 02:40 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 557
|
RFU and X10+
Forum: XtremeLink Radio System
Last Post: flyingw
12-01-2025, 09:33 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 1,068
|
Digital Servo Interaction...
Forum: Nano
Last Post: flyingw
11-09-2025, 11:52 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 1,567
|
10X+ V3
Forum: X10+
Last Post: vvpassero@gmail.com
10-22-2025, 07:22 PM
» Replies: 9
» Views: 5,567
|
Nice XPS conversion
Forum: XtremeLink Radio System
Last Post: XPS
10-12-2025, 05:55 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 799
|
Radio Inventory
Forum: XtremeLink Radio System
Last Post: flyingw
09-16-2025, 12:00 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 1,707
|
|
|
| XDP and Telemetry Station |
|
Posted by: flyingw - 04-24-2025, 12:37 PM - Forum: Telemetry
- Replies (4)
|
 |
XPS,
Over the years I've been able to use the XDP device or the Telemetry Station for the XPS Radio System applications like the Programmer, Scanner and Updater.
I just observed that while the Telemetry Station works with the RSSI application, I cannot run it with the XDP device.
Should the XDP work with the RSSI application? Or, it the RSSI application only intended for only the Telemetry Station?
Thank you,
Paul
|
|
|
| sudden dive |
|
Posted by: erhard52 - 03-19-2025, 08:16 PM - Forum: XtremeLink Radio System
- Replies (50)
|
 |
i wonder if anyone has a possible explanation for the following model behavior with nano receiver.
first time i crashed a larger glider 6 years ago the following way: i did i range test as recommended and forgot to remount the transmitter antenna. nevertheless i flew on a slope and the plane flew beautifully but then went into a sudden dive, i obviously pulled the elevator but nothing happen and just before crashing it recovered. oh i thought what was that and kept flying and it happened again, same thing it recovered. no i thought oh i better land. so i flew a larger loop behind the hill made a turn and the plane flew towards me ready for landing and suddenly when into a dive again and crashed.
obviously i blamed the missing antenna. i am not sure how fail safe is set but when i just turn off the transmitter all servos stay where they are.
second time just 1 week ago: another glider, flying happily and same dive behavior and plane luckily recovered. i thought it was maybe a down draft in the hills but way would it go in a real dive as if pushing down the elevator? after inspecting the plane i thought i found an issue with a lose vtail mount which allowed the vtail to slide along the fuselage. obviously nit good, so i fixed it thought that was it and following 5 flights or so where fine.
today i flew again and again the sudden dive happened and luckily i could recover just before crashing.
so what can this be?
down drafts don't seem to really explain the sudden dive
losing RC link should leave the servos in place and not cause the dive
any ideas what be great because it makes me very uncomfortable
btw: transmitter is a multiplex EVO 16 with XPS RF module
thanks
erhard
|
|
|
| Larger antenna |
|
Posted by: flyingw - 02-07-2025, 08:55 AM - Forum: Receivers
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Jim,
I have an airplane with a narrow fuselage that is filled with a motor, ESC, motor battery, X10+RFU and servos. The fuse also has a large metal landing gear bracket for the two main wheels. I had signal blocking problems with this airplane with two different radio systems, including XPS.
Even when I placed the receiver antennas away (as much as I could in the small fuse) from those interfering parts and oriented them at 90 degrees to each other, there were still angles at which the receiver couldn't see the transmitter. I would experience momentary lockouts until the airplane's orientation changed enough for the receiver antenna to come back into view of the transmitter.
I eventually placed one of the RFU antennas facing vertically down and sticking though the bottom of the fuse and this solved the RF blocking problem. However, the little nub sticking out under the fuse sometimes gets knocked around by the occasional rock, or I bend it if I pick up the fuse by grabbing it at the wrong spot.
I ideally would like to locate a Nano or RFU back near the tail, away from the main part of the fuse. Regrettably the fuse is narrow back there and it would challenging to install the Nano or RFU and route the antennas. I could put a Nano or RFU out near a wingtip, but I can't run the serial cable to it because the wing is sealed.
Is it possible to have an alternative "larger" antenna than the standard "one inch" elements? Could a longer wire antenna be tuned to receive the 2.4GHz signal? I'm thinking of something like an old school 72MHz 39 inch wire antenna that could run from the back of the canopy out to the top of the tail fin.
(This is kind of an ironic request, given that for almost twenty years we've enjoyed the convenience of installing small 2.4GHz receivers with their tiny antennas and not having to deal with long wire antennas.)
Thanks,
Paul
|
|
|
| 10X+ V3 |
|
Posted by: XPS - 09-30-2024, 07:45 AM - Forum: X10+
- Replies (9)
|
 |
The new version of the X10+ is in final testing. This version offers substantially more features than the original, including full setup all of those features wirelessly via any smart device or PC web browser - no more cables or specific software needed! Wireless firmware updates too!
The size is 0.150" taller, but the same width as the existing unit. There are now two LEDs to show the status of both receivers independently.
The X10+ supports up to 40V now, so you can use it with 24V robotic setups safely.
|
|
|
| Futaba and FrSky SBUS |
|
Posted by: flyingw - 09-22-2024, 01:27 PM - Forum: Setup and usage
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Jim,
I "learned" (just internet so I do not know how reliable the information is) that Futaba's SBUS uses 3.3v or 5v to represent a zero logic value in the bitstream and ground as a logic one in the bitstream.
FrSky's SBUS uses the opposite: They have ground as a zero value and 3.3v or 5v as the one value.
In my experiment where I fed SBUS to the X10+v2 from an FrSky receiver, the old analog servo did not work, but the digital servo worked. When I fed the X10+v2 SBUS from a Futaba receiver, both the old analog and the digital servo worked.
We concluded that the frame rate used by FrSky was too fast for the analog servo. Could it also have something to do with the FrSky SBUS voltages being opposite to that of the Futaba standard SBUS signal?
I had the X10+v2 configured to accept "Futaba SBUS" as the input (not the inverted choice).
Thanks for your opinion,
Paul
|
|
|
| X10+v2 and a Futaba SBUS Receiver |
|
Posted by: flyingw - 09-19-2024, 12:25 PM - Forum: Setup and usage
- Replies (1)
|
 |
I tried this experiment again, this time with a Futaba R2000SBM S-FHSS/SBUS receiver and got an interesting result.
I connected the SBUS output of the Futaba receiver to the X10+v2.
When I powered up the transmitter and receiver, I immediately got a green light on the X10+v2. I connected the old S148 servo and it worked perfectly! (It didn't work with the FrSky SBUS receiver). The digital servos, as expected, also worked perfectly.
The Transmitter is not even a Futaba transmitter, it is an OpenTx set with one of those 4in1 chipsets that includes the S-FHSS option.
I suppose that the S-FHSS protocol sent by the transmitter, in conjunction with the Futaba receiver and its SBUS link to the X10+v2 results in a frame rate that the S148 can handle.
I'll bet the FrSky SBUS uses 9ms frames and they are too fast for the S148. The Futaba SBUS receiver probably uses 14ms frames and the S148 can accept that.
My conclusion is that I have solution if my XPS-J1 transmitter module dies and I can no longer use my XPS receivers - I can use Futaba SBUS receivers with X10+v2s (or v3s and beyond) with my airplanes that still have analog servos.
|
|
|
|