Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Online Users |
There are currently 16 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 16 Guest(s)
|
Latest Threads |
Radio Inventory
Forum: XtremeLink Radio System
Last Post: flyingw
09-16-2025, 12:00 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 562
|
Green status light
Forum: X16
Last Post: XPS
09-08-2025, 08:37 PM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 1,551
|
nano
Forum: Nano
Last Post: XPS
09-08-2025, 08:36 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 1,457
|
X10 SBUS input gives stea...
Forum: Setup and usage
Last Post: XPS
09-07-2025, 02:59 AM
» Replies: 21
» Views: 12,087
|
10X+ V3
Forum: X10+
Last Post: flyingw
08-14-2025, 03:36 AM
» Replies: 8
» Views: 3,099
|
Are you comming with new ...
Forum: XtremeLink Radio System
Last Post: XPS
08-13-2025, 05:28 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 819
|
Use an XPS Futaba transmi...
Forum: Futaba
Last Post: XPS
07-24-2025, 05:16 PM
» Replies: 8
» Views: 1,562
|
8 channel RX
Forum: Receivers
Last Post: XPS
07-23-2025, 01:46 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 1,264
|
module needed for FrSky X...
Forum: Transmitter Modules
Last Post: rlocke
07-15-2025, 01:19 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 654
|
2 nanos
Forum: Nano
Last Post: XPS
07-14-2025, 05:37 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 664
|
|
|
Nano Availability? |
Posted by: TonyMegowan - 10-12-2021, 08:49 AM - Forum: Nano
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Jim
Top of the Morning to you Sir. Do you have an estimate on when the Nano's will be available? I need 4 or 5 of them.
Thanks
Tony Megowan
|
|
|
3d printed Nano mount? |
Posted by: j_whitney - 08-18-2021, 07:36 AM - Forum: Nano
- Replies (4)
|
 |
Is anyone aware of a 3D printed mount for the nano?
What I have been doing is using a bit of velcro on the "shrink wrap" on the nano. but it you have to move it more than once or twice the wrap starts to come loose from the board.
Any suggestions?
|
|
|
Programing RFU |
Posted by: bruff - 07-29-2021, 05:48 PM - Forum: RFU
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Can I reverse servos and adjust throw on the RFU while in S Bus mode?
Thanks!
Bob
|
|
|
binding troubles |
Posted by: Sunstateflier - 06-13-2021, 06:19 AM - Forum: JR/Taranis/Horus
- Replies (3)
|
 |
For many years I have been using XPS receivers with XPS modules in Multiplex 3030 and 4000 series without a problem.To back up these ageing radios I purchased a Radiomaster Max edition so I could use an XPS JR module and continue to use my XPS gear if these old radios ever failed.However,I am having trouble binding the modules to the receivers. One of the modules I purchased when the new batch became available recently and the other two came from an aeromodler in South Africa.(Iam not sure which is whitch now as I cant tell them apart) I have been able to bind one 10 chanel receiver to the radio but it wont always hold the bind when I turn it off,also the first chanel produces a third elevator chanel instead of an aileron. If I shift the chanels from 8 or 10 to chanels 2 to 9 I can sometimes get 8 working chanels.I have purchased the XPS gear over many years with only one return for upgrade quite some years ago,also I have not yet tried to bind any of the diversity receivers .Iam using the ppm setting on the Radiomaster with preset settings on delay and frame. I have not downloaded any new software to the radio,its only one week old. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
XJT-D16 versus PPM latency |
Posted by: flyingw - 06-09-2021, 05:52 PM - Forum: JR/Taranis/Horus
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Jim,
I was thinking about the latency in my RC systems.
I believe that my Futaba 9C transmitter delivers a new set of channel positions by way of PPM to the XPS transmitter module every 22,5 millisecinds.
Using the XJT-D16 protocol the Taranis delivers a new set of channel positions to the XPS JR-type module every 18 milliseconds.
This means I gain about 4.5 milliseconds using XJT-D16.
If I happened to be using all 16 channels I would be about twice as fast with XJT-D16 than I would be with PPM.
Is that correct?
Thanks,
Paul
|
|
|
RFU coax minimum bend radius |
Posted by: flyingw - 06-05-2021, 09:50 AM - Forum: RFU
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Jim,
On the RFU's coax antenna leads, what is the minimum bend radius that will not cause any reduction in signal strength?
I understand that the bare tip must be kept straight, and that the angled antennas must be at least two inches apart.
Thanks,
Paul
|
|
|
|