| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 24 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 24 Guest(s)
|
| Latest Threads |
New transmitter module
Forum: Transmitter Modules
Last Post: XPS
06-13-2026, 08:07 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 1,489
|
RF module for spectrum?
Forum: Multiplex EVO and Profi
Last Post: XPS
04-06-2026, 03:11 PM
» Replies: 54
» Views: 12,615
|
XPS module in EVO
Forum: Multiplex EVO and Profi
Last Post: XPS
03-19-2026, 10:16 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 473
|
X10+v2 and ELRS
Forum: Setup and usage
Last Post: XPS
03-05-2026, 01:21 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 908
|
X10+v1 and v2 and failsaf...
Forum: Setup and usage
Last Post: XPS
03-05-2026, 01:20 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 827
|
The Future
Forum: XtremeLink Radio System
Last Post: flyingw
01-31-2026, 09:54 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 2,124
|
Merry Christmas
Forum: XtremeLink Radio System
Last Post: XPS
12-21-2025, 03:30 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 1,569
|
SBUS-2 and the X10+v2
Forum: Setup and usage
Last Post: flyingw
12-11-2025, 02:40 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 1,259
|
RFU and X10+
Forum: XtremeLink Radio System
Last Post: flyingw
12-01-2025, 09:33 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 1,594
|
Digital Servo Interaction...
Forum: Nano
Last Post: flyingw
11-09-2025, 11:52 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 2,624
|
|
|
| Nano Availability? |
|
Posted by: TonyMegowan - 10-12-2021, 08:49 AM - Forum: Nano
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Jim
Top of the Morning to you Sir. Do you have an estimate on when the Nano's will be available? I need 4 or 5 of them.
Thanks
Tony Megowan
|
|
|
| 3d printed Nano mount? |
|
Posted by: j_whitney - 08-18-2021, 07:36 AM - Forum: Nano
- Replies (4)
|
 |
Is anyone aware of a 3D printed mount for the nano?
What I have been doing is using a bit of velcro on the "shrink wrap" on the nano. but it you have to move it more than once or twice the wrap starts to come loose from the board.
Any suggestions?
|
|
|
| Programing RFU |
|
Posted by: bruff - 07-29-2021, 05:48 PM - Forum: RFU
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Can I reverse servos and adjust throw on the RFU while in S Bus mode?
Thanks!
Bob
|
|
|
| binding troubles |
|
Posted by: Sunstateflier - 06-13-2021, 06:19 AM - Forum: JR/Taranis/Horus
- Replies (3)
|
 |
For many years I have been using XPS receivers with XPS modules in Multiplex 3030 and 4000 series without a problem.To back up these ageing radios I purchased a Radiomaster Max edition so I could use an XPS JR module and continue to use my XPS gear if these old radios ever failed.However,I am having trouble binding the modules to the receivers. One of the modules I purchased when the new batch became available recently and the other two came from an aeromodler in South Africa.(Iam not sure which is whitch now as I cant tell them apart) I have been able to bind one 10 chanel receiver to the radio but it wont always hold the bind when I turn it off,also the first chanel produces a third elevator chanel instead of an aileron. If I shift the chanels from 8 or 10 to chanels 2 to 9 I can sometimes get 8 working chanels.I have purchased the XPS gear over many years with only one return for upgrade quite some years ago,also I have not yet tried to bind any of the diversity receivers .Iam using the ppm setting on the Radiomaster with preset settings on delay and frame. I have not downloaded any new software to the radio,its only one week old. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
| XJT-D16 versus PPM latency |
|
Posted by: flyingw - 06-09-2021, 05:52 PM - Forum: JR/Taranis/Horus
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Jim,
I was thinking about the latency in my RC systems.
I believe that my Futaba 9C transmitter delivers a new set of channel positions by way of PPM to the XPS transmitter module every 22,5 millisecinds.
Using the XJT-D16 protocol the Taranis delivers a new set of channel positions to the XPS JR-type module every 18 milliseconds.
This means I gain about 4.5 milliseconds using XJT-D16.
If I happened to be using all 16 channels I would be about twice as fast with XJT-D16 than I would be with PPM.
Is that correct?
Thanks,
Paul
|
|
|
| RFU coax minimum bend radius |
|
Posted by: flyingw - 06-05-2021, 09:50 AM - Forum: RFU
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Jim,
On the RFU's coax antenna leads, what is the minimum bend radius that will not cause any reduction in signal strength?
I understand that the bare tip must be kept straight, and that the angled antennas must be at least two inches apart.
Thanks,
Paul
|
|
|
|